From my personal point of view, I think the idea goes in the following direction. We, as consumers, have no choice about the economic and geopolitical game of the planet. Consider the closure of a series of platforms related to freedom of expression through Cloudfare, this is a practical example and historical antecedent, of how we have no influence on the game that governs our lives in the day to day of our becoming. Is it possible, then, to exercise a democratic process through the market? What would happen if we could, through our choices in the commercial game of consuming goods and services, determine which corporations live and which die? In this way interacting with the rules that the Marshall Plan and Operation Condor imposed on the West and the South, we would be building the foundations of the future, pruning, restricting and allowing the growth of Milton Friedman's Yggdrasil branches today, anticipating the approaching techno-capital uniqueness and, uncontrolled as it is today, may be harmful to the future. We don't have to go into silence on the night of Neochina and Oprichnik Day or the next Xeno Caliphate of California and San Francisco, but we can't deny that if we wanted collectively as labor forces of the planet to crack the economic system through this idea, it would take a serious, tremendous, coordinated and international effort of mutual aid. And the communists have been fighting for something like this since the 19th century with minimal victories. Anarchists, on the other hand, are dogs. And I love dogs. Keep in mind, however, that research has been set in motion through the Internet and the mass media with the aim of arriving at the fabrication of synthetic tendencies of false sense of belonging. The first strains are already underway, and their achievements promise to cover this theoretically exploitable bug in the Commercium mosaic. For me the rest is poetry, music and stalkers dancing on PCP, THC, MDMA or DMT. All mixed up in the body, if you will.